Bilateral Guest Worker Agreements: A win-win solution for rich countries and poor people in the developing world
Publication Info
Publication Type
Download
Initiatives
Research Topics
CGD Expert
Opinions
- Migration Talk: Making Sense of a World on the Move
- Migration and Development: Q&A with Michael Clemens
- The World is not Flat: Inequality and Injustice in our Global Economy
- Reflections on "Our Common Interest," The Report of the Commission on Africa
- Rich Country Aging: Poor Country Risks
Rights and Permissions
We welcome the use of CGD work-just let us know in advance! For contact information see our Rights & Permissions page. CGD rights and permissions are managed under the terms of the Creative Commons license below.
Lant Pritchett
04/25/2007
By: Lant Pritchett
- On Thursday, May 17th Lant will answer your questions about Breaking the Gridlock on Labor Mobility live online at Ask CGD. Submit a question now
Increased labor mobility holds potentially huge gains for the developing and developed world. If rich countries were to permit a mere 3 percent increase in the size of their labor force by easing restrictions on labor mobility, the benefits to citizens of poor countries would be $305 billion a year--almost twice the combined annual benefits of full trade liberalization, foreign aid and debt relief. But increased migration is notoriously unpopular. Rich country citizens have legitimate concerns about the impact of low-skill migrant workers on public services, possible security risks, implications for existing low-income workers, and potential cultural impacts.
In this CGD Brief, non-resident fellow Lant Pritchett lays out a solution that is beneficial to poor people and potentially politically acceptable to rich country voters: temporary legal work programs negotiated bilaterally, wherein rich countries take responsibility for certifying labor shortages in specific industries and labor-sending countries take responsibility for ensuring that temporary workers actually return home.